Trump announced Thursday night that his "Board of Peace" reached a breakthrough with Hamas: the group agreed to lay down its weapons and give up control of Gaza in exchange for a phased Israeli withdrawal. It's the first time Hamas ever accepted a disarmament framework. The October 7, 2023 attack killed about 1,200 Israelis and took 251 hostages; Israel's retaliatory campaign has since killed over 73,000 Palestinians. Israel currently controls roughly 60% of Gaza.

1. The Deal Is Real (Trump, Tony Blair, Board of Peace)

The US says Hamas crossing this line is genuinely new, and the structure holds.

Hamas had never before accepted a disarmament framework — until now. Prior to July 30, the group had always rejected disarmament as a precondition for governance. Trump called the agreement "HISTORIC" and "a monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY."

The plan has a clear three-phase structure. Police weapons go first, transferred to a new Palestinian-led National Committee for the Administration of Gaza. Then heavy weapons, military production sites, and Hamas's tunnel network — on a 200–350 day timeline. An international stabilization force oversees the process. As each stage is independently verified, Israeli troops withdraw.

The Board of Peace has serious international backing. Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair chairs the seven-member executive board. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, and World Bank President Ajay Banga are all involved. The US, Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar are guarantors.

2. We Signed — But Israel Has to Move First (Ghazi Hamad, Hamas political bureau)

Hamas's signature flips the sequence: the group won't disarm until Israel withdraws.

The deal is conditional, and Hamas's negotiating delegate spelled it out. Ghazi Hamad said Hamas "will not implement any step of the Gaza peace deal if the Israeli occupation forces do not fulfil their obligations." Israeli withdrawal comes before disarmament — not after.

The conditions go further than sequencing. Weapons stay under Palestinian control — not handed to Israel or any external party. Hamas military commanders keep personal firearms. And full disarmament of heavy weapons is "contingent on the creation of a Palestinian state," which Israel currently opposes.

The group's military wing never signed off. Hamas's Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades said in April 2026 that disarmament demands were "not acceptable." The political bureau's conditional agreement doesn't appear to reflect the armed wing's position — and the armed wing has the weapons.

3. Hamas Won't Actually Disarm (Itamar Ben Gvir, senior Israeli officials)

Israel sees the signing as a tactical delay, not a genuine commitment — and won't move until the weapons are gone.

No Israeli withdrawal happens before Hamas disarms. A senior Israeli official stated plainly: "There will be no IDF withdrawal from the current Yellow Line without the genuine disarmament of Hamas." Israel's sequence is the mirror image of Hamas's: full demilitarization first, then discussion of withdrawal.

The deal is "unacceptable." National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said targeted killings of Hamas operatives must continue and that "Israel must win." His camp views any arrangement that leaves Hamas armed — however it's packaged — as rewarding the October 7 massacre.

Netanyahu hasn't publicly said a word about the deal. He faces a national election by October 27, 2026. Any visible concession — including partial IDF withdrawal — is politically dangerous weeks before the vote. His officials have rejected the roadmap; he has said nothing.

Where This Lands

Hamas has, for the first time, accepted a written disarmament framework — and that's real. But what Hamas signed and what Israel will accept are incompatible on the one question that matters: who moves first. European Council on Foreign Relations analyst Muhammad Shehada has argued that "disarmament must be the outcome of a functioning peace, not the prerequisite for one" — pointing to the IRA, which fully disarmed in 2005, seven years after the Good Friday Agreement established peace. Israel's own Phase 1 compliance is already in question. The ceasefire requires 600 aid trucks a day into Gaza; Israel is allowing far fewer. Humanitarian organizations report deliveries well under 200 even on the best days. Trump's "historic" agreement is, as of now, a deal both sides claim to support — and both sides are waiting for the other to move first.

Sources